An Open Letter to Joe Biden

Hi Joe,

You said you wanted to cure cancer. Well, that might be tough inasmuch as cancer is not exactly a disease. Cancer is a rapid growth of cells.

I am not an expert on cancer. However, it looks to me as if there are 3 general causes of cancer:

1: Physical. Such as radiation or UV light. Cancer caused by physical processes may not be practical to solve in that, “How thick of a lead suit do you want to wear?”.

2: Chemical. These would be the carcinogens (aside from the physical ones).

3: Genetic. These are things that are hardwired into your chromosomes.

It is impractical to try to solve the physical type of cancer aside from avoiding the exposure. The damage is being done randomly, and it would be hard to find any one thing to address all possible problems.

It is likely that the genetic problems are just that, a multiple number of unique problems, which would require specific solutions to each type of genetic problem.

That leaves only 1 choice, those types of cancer that are caused by chemical agents. The thing of it is, chemicals have to be somewhere. Chemical carcinogens do cause cancer years or decades after exposure to the carcinogen. These chemical molecules should in theory dissipate over time with dilution. Inasmuch as the carcinogens did not dissipate, it indicates that the carcinogens are being “held” somewhere. I am suggesting that these carcinogens are being held in the resonance structures of the chromosomes. Not only do they have to be somewhere, they have to be somewhere where they can cause cancer.

Now you might think that this is going to require years and tens of millions of dollars (or more). However,  I am going to suggest another alternative. I am going to force you to check whether a specific technology (the same technology as in my U.S. Patents) can be used to drop the kill-rate of the COVID-19 virus. This should be quick, relatively easy, and inexpensive (compared to the cost of doing other medical things).

You might be thinking, “How is this going to help with cancer?”.  The process will work, because it works on the Gas Law. Once people know that the process works, it’ll be obvious what to use the process for. The reason that the virus is not going to do as well against the cells treated with Tackett Technology (tt) is that, the cells themselves have reset protein levels inside the cell to an earlier point in time. Once the idea, that you can go ahead and reset the age of a cell, it won’t be long before they will want to do it for the entire body.

I guess it’s time to get around your gatekeeper. Hi, Gatekeeper! Please note that I am a U.S. inventor. I have been granted not one, but two U.S. Patents. The patents are basically a method of running a chemical process backwards. The only way I could get a patent on running a chemical process backward, is if I had discovered the process to begin with. I am the world expert on the subject. The idea came out of my mind. I am saying that this should be tested. I am saying that the risk to benefit ratio on this suggests that it would be criminal not to test this. For example, it might only cost $100,000 for materials to run the test. The cost of the pandemic looks to be in the trillions of dollars.

Gatekeeper, please forward this to someone with a law degree if possible. I think almost any officer of the court would be smart enough to expedite and help resolve this. You might want to put your initials/date/time for when you forward this to the next person. You might not want to be caught holding the bag on this one.

Back at the ranch, hi Joe!

I hope I got past your gatekeeper. There are a couple more things that we might want to do. You might want to have the Agriculture Department provide auxotrophs to high school, college, and university teachers, so that their students can make pseudomutants. You might wonder why we want to help educate the people about pseudomutants, the thing that’s significant about the pseudomutants is that, by definition, they shouldn’t exist. Pseudomutants help to demonstrate intron function.

You might wonder why I am suggesting that we make this available. It is because there are a number of major league screw ups in biology. They kind of messed up on the structure of DNA, twice. They are assuming that DNA has the same structure in water as it does in a salt crystal. They are also assuming that DNA has only 1 structure. Both assumptions are false.

At present, people are being taught evolution is protein evolution, and they don’t know what 60% of the genome is doing. The problem is that our proteins are evolving far too slow to account for our evolution. For example, the average human produces over a trillion bacterial cells a day. If it were just protein evolution, the bacteria should be evolving far faster. The fact is that the bacterial proteins are evolving faster. We know this, because sometimes the upgraded protein sequence from the bacterium is incorporated in the DNA of a eukaryotic organism. Because of evolution, it is possible to see that sequences from the bacterial cells are not in other species that have branched from a common point.

Our DNA has not one structure, but three main structures. These structures correspond to three types of DNA in our body. The highly repetitive DNA is a resonance structure. How do I know? Because, the highly repetitive DNA bonds at temperatures higher than the moderately repetitive DNA or single copy DNA. The moderately repetitive DNA is also a resonance structure (but not the same type of resonance structure). The moderately repetitive DNA also form bonds at a higher temperature than the single copy DNA. These two types of DNA correspond to two systems of inheritance that are presently unrecognized.

As you can see, science is messed up. So how do we straighten science out? We ignore science and talk to Google. What we do is we meet with Google, and create a partnership to build the True Science Platform (or the Google Science Platform). What we do is create a platform so that science effectively becomes true science. What is true science? True science is when you define science as an ordered method of determining the truth, and you define truth as: Take the universe, label it A (its all inclusive). Take the same universe, Label it B. The function which relates A to B, and B to A is truth.

Why would the U.S. government want to build such a platform? Because, the U.S. government might want to have enhanced access to the database.

Hopefully, the new platform will allow science to go forward more rapidly by being able to correct problems quicker.

As it stands, the U.S. government is handing over billions of dollars to the scientific community. Anybody who knows that things are incorrect are going to keep their mouth shut and keep collecting their paychecks. It’s not like one of these military schools where they will not lie, cheat, steal or tolerate anybody who does. These people will sit back and do their own things, rather than burning their time correcting problems created by people they don’t even know. It’s also kind of hard to propose that the structure of DNA is wrong without people thinking you’re crazy (everybody knows the world’s flat).

To sum up, the pseudomutants and platform are not critical but additional things that can be done. The critical thing is to test tt (Tackett Technology). The reason it is critical is that people are dying from problems that tt is likely to correct. If anyones in doubt of whether I am serious, you can probably catch the metro, go over to the patent office, and look at the files.

Thanks

Sincerely,

Scott Tackett